Ballistic Missile Defense Essay -- American Government, Nuclear Arsena

instaurationToday we live in a time where developing countries and terrorist organizations be vying for world power. A common way this is attempted is through the growth of nuclear arms and delivery systems for them namely Intercontinental Ballistic projectile (ICBM). more of these countries are hostel to the get together States and her allies. Also the existence counties with cock-a-hoop nuclear arsenals such as Russia, increase the chance of an accidental launch. In order to counter threats form rouge nations and accidental ballistic projectile launches, the joined States should pursue development of a missile defense system. insensate WAR AND THE ABM TREATYThe first ICBM, The R-7, was developed by the Soviet Union in 1953 (Korolev). After this event, both the Soviet Union and the United States started to develop and deploy increasingly powerful and accurate ICBMs. This build up of powerful weapons caused an escalation in tension between the U.S. and the USSR, both expect ing an attack at any(prenominal)time. The potential destructive force the weapons had and the high tension environment guide to the theory of MAD or mutually assured destruction to scrape into existence. This theory works on the principle that deterrence against a nuclear attack was to be maintained through the ability of each facial expression to inflict an unacceptable degree of damage (Lettow 22). MAD is the thing that unploughed nuclear Armageddon form occurring during the Cold War as both sides virgin that if they launched an all out attack, the other side would as well, destroying both. MAD relies on an equal balance of force, so that no one country feels give care they could come out ahead in a nuclear war. Many top strategic experts were concerned that ABM systems could destabilize this delicate ... ...3). Although this is not a small amount it is a large improvement everywhere the 1.2 trillion dollars required for a SDI scale project. The benefits conferred by this kind of intend protection against small scale ICBM attacks and TBM attacks is worth the price. The ultimate close of missile defense is to convince countries that ballistic missiles are not militarily useful or a worthy investment and placed doubt in the minds of potential aggressors that a ballistic missile attack against the United States or its allies can succeed (Missile Defense Agency). This form of missile defense would act as a deterrent to those countries to whom MAD does not apply. Countries hostile to the U.S. would be discouraged from attempting to use ballistic missiles against the U.S. in any first strike or strategic ways as it would exit no tactical advantage(Kaufman 116).