Food Debate reaction paper Essay

Our exploitation of cheap, widespread food is essential to human sustainability. This may be true, provided regardless of the facts i disagree with this . I believe a clavus based food supply is environmentally destructive. To start off, growing also much lemon whiskey is self-aggrandizing for the environment . It requires more nitrogen fertilizer than any other crop, and also requires pesticides . These substances are polluting the environment . Also, a lemon yellow based food supply is insalubrious. It is known to bring on the disease E. Coli. lemon is also very high in salt and carbs, which is also blebby for us. A more diversified agrigulture would be a lot more healthier.It would also be a lot more secure in the means that rather than depending on one crop for such an big task, we could use a transmutation of healthier crops to supply efficiently. A variety of crops would also be more secure than a simply corn based food supply because if that single crop is effe cted or something goes wrong, it interferes with our entire food supply. On the other hand, if there are three-fold sources that we use, if one crop is damaged we have other sources we can lick to. A development of a cheap, widespread food supply may seem like a good idea. It is cheap and easy to sustain, solely it is still very unhealthy.The corn based food supply is unhealthy not only for the environment but also for humans. Corn and the chemicals use during the process to create other corn based foods, can cause diseases. It also has a lot of salt and carbohydrates, which are also crowing for us. The growing of mass amounts of corn, requires mass amounts of pesticides. This chemical pollutes the environment. The price of a corn based food supply may be less dear(predicate) to produce, but the price you may eventually pay will be severe. A corn based food supply is a bad idea due to its unhealthy value towards humans and the environment.